Kukama women and the marañón river: a history of subjugation, resistance, and environmental litigation

Authors

  • Renzo Ramírez Roca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52980/gmpj7538

Keywords:

Amazonian indigenous women, Rights of nature, Extractivism, Gender coloniality, Environmental litigation, Kukama people

Abstract

In March 2024, the Mixed Court of Nauta recognized the Marañón River as a rights-bearing entity following a lawsuit filed by the Kukama Women's Federation Huaynakana Kamatahuara Kana. This article situates that ruling within a long-term historical trajectory to examine its genealogy and implications. The central question analyzes how a history of dispossession and invisibilization shaped the lawsuit and the leadership of the women who led it. The analysis identifies five historically specific mechanisms through which different forms of power managed indigenous subalternity from the colonial period to the present. The findings show that the 2024 ruling marked a break in this logic of domination by incorporating Kukama ontology as legally binding grounds, and that the female leadership that made it posible reversed the subordinate role historically imposed on Kukama women by the extractive model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Kukama women and the marañón river: a history of subjugation, resistance, and environmental litigation. (2026). Peruvian Amazon, 39, 101-125. https://doi.org/10.52980/gmpj7538

Similar Articles

1-10 of 291

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.